🤯 Did You Know (click to read)
Conflict mitigation programs often include livestock compensation to discourage retaliatory killings.
Habitat loss and prey depletion sometimes push Malayan tigers toward agricultural edges and rural settlements. When natural prey becomes scarce, livestock may become opportunistic targets. Such encounters often end fatally for the tiger. Even rare incidents amplify fear and retaliatory killing. Conflict zones emerge where forest boundaries meet plantations. Each encounter further reduces tolerance for predator presence. For a population under 150, even isolated conflict deaths are significant.
💥 Impact (click to read)
Human-tiger conflict reflects ecological imbalance rather than inherent aggression. As territories contract, spatial overlap increases. Preventative measures such as livestock enclosures and early-warning systems can reduce risk. Education and compensation programs are critical for coexistence.
Without proactive mitigation, fear-driven retaliation can undo years of conservation progress. The shrinking buffer between rainforest and human development narrows options for both species. Long-term survival depends on balancing human livelihoods with predator recovery.
Source
World Wildlife Fund Malaysia Human-Wildlife Conflict Programs
💬 Comments