🤯 Did You Know (click to read)
Great apes have some of the slowest reproductive rates among terrestrial mammals.
Historical hunting pressure in parts of the Cross River region reduced certain gorilla groups to single-digit numbers. Bushmeat demand and opportunistic hunting severely impacted local populations before enforcement improved. In such tiny groups, every death represented a significant percentage of the total. Unlike species with rapid reproduction, Cross River gorillas could not quickly replace losses. Some subpopulations required decades to stabilize after heavy pressure. The scars of those reductions are still visible in today’s low genetic diversity. Survival required enduring demographic collapse without complete extinction.
💥 Impact (click to read)
Small group size increases vulnerability to stochastic events. A single hunting incident can remove multiple related individuals at once. Social disruption compounds demographic loss, as remaining members struggle to maintain stability. Inbreeding risk rises when unrelated mates are scarce. Conservation patrols have since reduced direct poaching, but historical impacts linger biologically.
The lesson extends beyond one subspecies. Large-bodied mammals reproduce slowly and cannot withstand sustained offtake. When populations dip into single digits, extinction becomes statistically probable. The Cross River gorilla’s persistence after such reductions borders on improbable resilience. Yet resilience should not be mistaken for immunity. With total numbers still under 300, the margin for error remains razor thin.
💬 Comments